Constitutional Safety is the spatial/structural interpretation of the Non-Negotiable Safety floor. The floor is defined as principles; the figure visualises how cases, signals, and principles relate.
Observational signals and cases—such as those collected via platforms like safety.observer—may reveal stress, drift, or tension at safety boundaries. They inform constitutional reflection, but never redefine the boundaries themselves.
The figure below offers a spatial interpretation of constitutional safety, complementing the accompanying paper.
Figure: Relations among cases, signals and principles.
License: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Canonical reference: Safety.Gallery
A three-dimensional rendering of the constitutional safety concept, illustrating how integration space emerges only when natural viability, constitutional safety, contextual boundaries, and technological amplification remain structurally aligned over time.
A citable archival version of this figure is available via Zenodo (PDF).
- Related links: Canonical 2D representation available in Safety.Gallery.
- Further reading: NEDION Foundation. (2026). Constitutional Safety — A Foundational Interaction Geometry for Living Together. NEDION Press. https://doi.org/10.65620/constitutional-safety
- Context: Foundational Editorial: Rajabali Nejad, M. (2026). When One Life Becomes Humanity — Moral Amplification, Responsibility, and the Conditions of Freedom. Safety.Science — Journal of Integrated Safety, 1(1). https://doi.org/10.65620/safetyscience.editorial.2026.002